Tweet
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion
🎥 When Mark Sharman; Former ITV and BSkyB Executive, approached us earlier this year with an invitation to collaborate on a film exposing the scale of Covid-19 vaccine injuries, I don’t think either party was prepared for quite how harrowing a task it would be.
In this interview with Brian Gerrish at UK Column, Mark was able to finally discuss our upcoming documentary - Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion.
In a short preview of the film, we see the heartbreaking reality of vaccine damage to a young woman, Georgia Segal. Her courage in dealing with her post-vaccine harm, and in speaking out so that others can understand the reality of these side effects, is extraordinary.
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them.
From the accuracy and trustworthiness of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate on the subject.​
In this interview with Brian Gerrish at UK Column, Mark was able to finally discuss our upcoming documentary - Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion.
In a short preview of the film, we see the heartbreaking reality of vaccine damage to a young woman, Georgia Segal. Her courage in dealing with her post-vaccine harm, and in speaking out so that others can understand the reality of these side effects, is extraordinary.
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them.
From the accuracy and trustworthiness of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in suppressing free and open debate on the subject.​