Tweet
Pfizer Stopped Testing their COVID Vaccine on Animals Because they Kept Dying. Now Judge Orders Information
Pfizer stopped testing their COVID Vaccine on animals because they kept dying.
Now a Judge in Uruguay has ordered Pfizer to provide "extensive detail" on the biochemical composition, including the possible presence of "graphene oxide" or "nanotechnological elements", and evidence of efficacy and safety of its COVID vaccine within 48 hours.
Court Orders
1) Submit a "certified copy" in "full" of "each and every one of the contracts for the purchase of vaccines against a coronavirus that organisms have subscribed or to "just be at your fingertips."
Agencies must manifest if "these instruments have contained clauses indemnity civil" or "impunity criminal" for providers.
2) Give "comprehensive detail about the biochemical composition" of all the vaccines given in the country (Pfizer, Sinovac, AstraZeneca), but especially that of Pfizer, to be used on minors.
3) Explain whether "the dose is distributed batch or split differential". Being the second, the judge asks to know, "for what reason, and based on what criteria, would provide each one to different levels of population".
4) Specify which vaccines contain a substance called 'messenger RNA', to explain what that term means, and detail "what therapeutic consequences or extraterapéuticas -adverse or not - can lead to the person she inoculated". Agencies must base your answer if you argue that this mechanism is inócuo.
5) Report on "the possible presence of graphene oxide in the calls vaccines available to the population."
6) State if the vaccines contain "elements of nanotechnology". In these last three claims are asked to specify if it is unknown about the components of the vaccine.
7) Certify "if the substances contained in the caller-supplied vaccines in Uruguay, are experimental or not", and if you are " approved" by the Food and Drug administration (FDA), or by "another kind permission of emergency". They also must certify whether any entity, or state pharmaceutical, admitted "the experimental nature of the above-mentioned 'vaccines'".
8. Present the available information of what "scientifically it is known-and not known - about the effectiveness" of these injections, and their "after-effects in the short, medium and long term".
9. Provide the "official figures" of the "negative impact or positive" of vaccination in relation to "the number of infections and deaths" for the coronavirus since the start of the vaccination campaign to date.
10. Manifest "if they have made efforts to explain the dramatic increase of deaths from Covid-19 as of march of 2021".
11. Describe the average age of global deaths due to coronavirus in the country, and many of them were "for" the coronavirus (due to illness) and how many "with" the virus (without be directly due to the disease). To prove "scientifically" if they are not vaccinated are a "danger health for the whole population"
12. If the answer is yes, Recarey wants to get to know "the determination and demonstration of the degree of danger", if the vaccinated and non-vaccinated "spread by the same, or not", and that would explain why "the vaccination would not have been ordered mandatory".
13. Clarify "the reasons for the unpredictability of informed consent" in the vaccination campaign of the government.
14. Provide the identity of the "professional technicians" that "have directed" this campaign, or have advised the government "at any level". It is also requested that detail if any of them is inserted or integrated into "any organisation, governmental or para-governmental foreign", or "any multinational company" focused in the area of health.
15. Expose if it is studied and alternative "therapies" against the coronavirus. If the answer is negative, the authorities need to clarify "why not explored these exits", and if it is positive they must provide the results of the investigation, and if it were used in Uruguay.
Note: this information was translated into English.
In a related story...
Now a Judge in Uruguay has ordered Pfizer to provide "extensive detail" on the biochemical composition, including the possible presence of "graphene oxide" or "nanotechnological elements", and evidence of efficacy and safety of its COVID vaccine within 48 hours.
Court Orders
1) Submit a "certified copy" in "full" of "each and every one of the contracts for the purchase of vaccines against a coronavirus that organisms have subscribed or to "just be at your fingertips."
Agencies must manifest if "these instruments have contained clauses indemnity civil" or "impunity criminal" for providers.
2) Give "comprehensive detail about the biochemical composition" of all the vaccines given in the country (Pfizer, Sinovac, AstraZeneca), but especially that of Pfizer, to be used on minors.
3) Explain whether "the dose is distributed batch or split differential". Being the second, the judge asks to know, "for what reason, and based on what criteria, would provide each one to different levels of population".
4) Specify which vaccines contain a substance called 'messenger RNA', to explain what that term means, and detail "what therapeutic consequences or extraterapéuticas -adverse or not - can lead to the person she inoculated". Agencies must base your answer if you argue that this mechanism is inócuo.
5) Report on "the possible presence of graphene oxide in the calls vaccines available to the population."
6) State if the vaccines contain "elements of nanotechnology". In these last three claims are asked to specify if it is unknown about the components of the vaccine.
7) Certify "if the substances contained in the caller-supplied vaccines in Uruguay, are experimental or not", and if you are " approved" by the Food and Drug administration (FDA), or by "another kind permission of emergency". They also must certify whether any entity, or state pharmaceutical, admitted "the experimental nature of the above-mentioned 'vaccines'".
8. Present the available information of what "scientifically it is known-and not known - about the effectiveness" of these injections, and their "after-effects in the short, medium and long term".
9. Provide the "official figures" of the "negative impact or positive" of vaccination in relation to "the number of infections and deaths" for the coronavirus since the start of the vaccination campaign to date.
10. Manifest "if they have made efforts to explain the dramatic increase of deaths from Covid-19 as of march of 2021".
11. Describe the average age of global deaths due to coronavirus in the country, and many of them were "for" the coronavirus (due to illness) and how many "with" the virus (without be directly due to the disease). To prove "scientifically" if they are not vaccinated are a "danger health for the whole population"
12. If the answer is yes, Recarey wants to get to know "the determination and demonstration of the degree of danger", if the vaccinated and non-vaccinated "spread by the same, or not", and that would explain why "the vaccination would not have been ordered mandatory".
13. Clarify "the reasons for the unpredictability of informed consent" in the vaccination campaign of the government.
14. Provide the identity of the "professional technicians" that "have directed" this campaign, or have advised the government "at any level". It is also requested that detail if any of them is inserted or integrated into "any organisation, governmental or para-governmental foreign", or "any multinational company" focused in the area of health.
15. Expose if it is studied and alternative "therapies" against the coronavirus. If the answer is negative, the authorities need to clarify "why not explored these exits", and if it is positive they must provide the results of the investigation, and if it were used in Uruguay.
Note: this information was translated into English.
In a related story...
Comment