Tweet
Pfizer Could Face Fraud Claims: Dr. Malone Shares What Needs To Happen For Them To Be Found Liable
Here’s the transcription of the video:
Fraud can also be the suppression of information about either efficacy or safety. And this is potentially why the legal decision to force the disclosure of the Pfizer dossier rather than on the 75 year timeline, is so significant, is it because it potentially opens Pfizer up to fraud claims.
Then there’s the insurance actuarial data that shows all-cause mortality spikes that seem to correlate with major surges in vaccination because of mandates, etc. And so the failure of a vaccine manufacturer or distributor to account for those or acknowledge them could also be considered evidence of fraud. What, when you listen to the very careful, now increasingly cautious, nuanced wording of, for instance, CEO Bourla of Pfizer, in which apparently he will not address the question of whether the vaccines are safe and effective. Those are all tells that they know that there are issues there and they don’t want to be caught on a live mic, giving any information that could lead to conclusions that they were aware of the problems. Because that would potentially pierce the veil.
So that that seems to be where it’s at right now is can anyone find a legal theory that meets the criteria for fraud? Or is sufficiently close to meeting that legal criteria that you can force either FDA or CDC. In other words, the federal government or the vaccine manufacturers into court and get them into discovery phase. That’s that’s the big kahuna here is trying to get them to discovery phase, because the belief is that if they’re forced into a position of discovery phase, they’re going to collapse because it’ll, once you’re in discovery for something like this, every single email that has ever been generated in that company that has keywords like Comirnaty or whatever, or you know, pick your your myocarditis will become discoverable and will be evaluated by attorneys, weaponized and potentially could yield significant financial liability.
– Dr. Robert Malone
The question that I hear is, from these attorneys repeatedly, is how, what are the options to pierce the veil of the indemnification is the technical term they use. And a lot of those strategies revolve around whether or not fraud occurred. So for instance, in the case of how bad is my batch, you know that there are bad batches out there that are associated with a much higher incidence of death and disease from the bad jab as a captured in the VAERS reports and otherwise, versus other lots. And so there’s a theory, a legal theory that a failure to act by the FDA and by pharma, on those lots which are, appear to be worse than their neighbour lots represents fraud.
Fraud can also be the suppression of information about either efficacy or safety. And this is potentially why the legal decision to force the disclosure of the Pfizer dossier rather than on the 75 year timeline, is so significant, is it because it potentially opens Pfizer up to fraud claims.
Then there’s the insurance actuarial data that shows all-cause mortality spikes that seem to correlate with major surges in vaccination because of mandates, etc. And so the failure of a vaccine manufacturer or distributor to account for those or acknowledge them could also be considered evidence of fraud. What, when you listen to the very careful, now increasingly cautious, nuanced wording of, for instance, CEO Bourla of Pfizer, in which apparently he will not address the question of whether the vaccines are safe and effective. Those are all tells that they know that there are issues there and they don’t want to be caught on a live mic, giving any information that could lead to conclusions that they were aware of the problems. Because that would potentially pierce the veil.
So that that seems to be where it’s at right now is can anyone find a legal theory that meets the criteria for fraud? Or is sufficiently close to meeting that legal criteria that you can force either FDA or CDC. In other words, the federal government or the vaccine manufacturers into court and get them into discovery phase. That’s that’s the big kahuna here is trying to get them to discovery phase, because the belief is that if they’re forced into a position of discovery phase, they’re going to collapse because it’ll, once you’re in discovery for something like this, every single email that has ever been generated in that company that has keywords like Comirnaty or whatever, or you know, pick your your myocarditis will become discoverable and will be evaluated by attorneys, weaponized and potentially could yield significant financial liability.