No announcement yet.


No announcement yet.

NZ Legal Protections

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NZ Legal Protections

    As the Covid-19 vaccine roll continues in NZ at speed, and the use of “vaccine passports” draws ever closer, an increasing number of people are voicing their opposition to these moves and claiming they are an infringement of their rights under the 1949 Nuremberg Code.

    The Nuremberg Code is a set of ethical research principles, developed in the wake of Nazi atrocities—specifically the inhumane and often fatal experimentation on human subjects without consent and often without anaesthetic—during World War Two.

    The Nuremberg Code was created in 1947 in Nuremberg, Germany, following the trial of a group of Nazi doctors accused of conducting inhumane and often deadly experiments on prisoners of concentration camps without their consent. At the conclusion of what’s also referred to as ‘The Doctors Trial’, 16 people were found guilty.

    The Nuremberg Code was developed in response to the horrors of this experimentation, with the aim of protecting human subjects in medical research. The Code, and particularly its emphasis on informed consent, has had a profound impact on international human rights law and medical ethics.

    The Nuremberg Code consists of 10 principles, they are as follows:

    The Nuremberg Code (1949)
    1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
    2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
    3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
    4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
    5. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
    6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
    7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
    8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
    9. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible.
    10. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
    "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.]

    Clearly, given that NZ is a signatory to these codes (and they are only codes), they shouldn't be able to mandate or enforce vaccination upon anyone. To do so would effectively be a crime against humanity. But they can "blackmail" businesses with threats of closure or people with the loss of their jobs through employment law changes if they don't comply with vaccine mandates.

    NZ Legislation

    We have other legislation that also affords protections:

    The Human Rights Act 1993
    21 Prohibited grounds of discrimination
    (1) For the purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are—
    (c) religious belief:
    (d) ethical belief, which means the lack of a religious belief, whether in
    respect of a particular religion or religions or all religions:
    (h) disability, which means—
    (i) physical disability or impairment:
    (ii) physical illness

    Our freedom is not the governments to give nor take away - it is ours by right
    What about the segregation (2-class society) caused by giving rights to the vaccinated and taking rights away from the unvaccinated? Surely this is a form of discrimination.

    This appears to be covered also by the Human Rights Act 1993:

    65 Indirect discrimination
    Where any conduct, practice, requirement, or condition that is not apparently in contravention of any provision of this Part has the effect of treating a person or group of persons differently on 1 of the prohibited grounds of discrimination in a situation where such treatment would be unlawful under any provision of this Part other than this section, that conduct, practice, condition, or requirement shall be unlawful under that provision unless the person whose conduct or practice is in issue, or who imposes the condition or requirement, establishes good reason for it.

    The NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990

    Part 1 Section 4 waters down the legislation so much, that it may as well not exist at all. Having said that, I note the following:

    5 Justified limitations
    Subject to section 4, the rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights may be subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

    11 Right to refuse to undergo medical treatment
    Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment.

    Part 3
    Miscellaneous provisions

    28 Other rights and freedoms not affected
    An existing right or freedom shall not be held to be abrogated or restricted by reason only that the right or freedom is not included in this Bill of Rights or is included only in part.

    This says that we have an existing right or freedom under Common Law, which takes presidence and, just because it isn't mentioned in this Act, it cannot be "abrogated or restricted".

    The question is would not taking the vaccine, causing you to become discriminated against, become that "establishment of a good reason" as mentioned in s.65 above? I submit that the answer is surely no on the following grounds:
    1. None of the vaccines are approved. Yes that is correct - they only have Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) from the FDA in the USA
    2. None of the usual testing that is required for authorisation has been done. The human population are the guinea pigs
    3. The pharmaceutical companies refuse to release any raw data related to the development and trials of these vaccines
    4. The only way EUA can be given is if there are no viable alternatives are currently in the market place. There actually are many, namely:
      1. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) + zinc - This medicine has been around for more than 65 years and has been treating Covid extremely successfully
      2. Ivermectin (note that this is the human version CNN & 3News) - This medicine has been around for more than 40 years and is on the CDC list of essential medicines
      3. Azithromycin taken with Zinc Sulphate
      4. Budesonide (Asthma inhalers)
      5. Anti-viral mouthwash containing chlorhexodone, povidone-iodine, or cetylpyridinium chloride
      6. Iodine nasal spray with 1% povidone-iodine
    5. Doctors were threatened with losing their practising certificates if they continued to prescribe any of the therapeutics such as HCQ or Ivermectin or they over-dosed patients with as much as 5 times the recommended dosage that killed the patient, in the case of HCQ and then blamed that medicine for the death
    6. Vaccine makers are immune from liability for approved medications. All major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when then knew those product would cause injuries and death–see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and Opioids as a few examples. To reiterate - 3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result
    7. The ‘Data Gaps’ Submitted to the FDA by the vaccine makers. When vaccine makers submitted their papers to the FDA for the Emergency Use Authorisation (Note: An EUA is not the same as a full FDA approval), among the many “Data Gaps” they reported was that they have nothing in their trials to suggest they overcame that pesky problem of Vaccine Enhanced Disease
    8. There is no long term safety testing. Most medicines take between 5 and 10 years to get approved. The Covid vaccines were produced in less than 12 months with little testing and no data releases
    9. There is no informed consent, if there were, nobody would take these experimental poisons. People need to be made aware of all the risks so they can make an informed decision
    10. Less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS). From 14 December to 23 April 2021 VAERS reports over 3,500 deaths, as well as approximately 120,000 adverse reactions. Doing the math, that equates to approximately 1,200,000 deaths, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions! The cure must never be worse than the disease
    11. Under-reporting of adverse reactions and deaths. The National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) is so difficult to use. One whistle-blower nurse says that it takes up to 30 minutes to enter a single adverse report and then the data is generally not released
    12. The vaccines do not stop transmission or infection. The reason is because these vaccines were never designed to stop transmission OR infection. The primary endpoint (what the vaccines are meant to accomplish) is to lower your symptoms. To get the vaccine is to accept all the risk of these experimental products, and the best it might do, is lower your symptoms?
    13. People catch Covid after being vaccinated
    14. Many hospital admissions in the Northern hemisphere are now fully vaccinated people. Our turn is coming
    15. The overall survival rate of the Covid original strain is over 99.74%. It is no worse than the seasonal flu. The Delta and Kappa strains are weaker
    16. The bloated death numbers. Hospitals were paid for each "Covid" death. If a person died an a car accident who also had Covid, their death was listed as a Covid death. These facts are backed up my Funeral Home directors of all people. The families of victims get upset when they know their loved ones died of one thing - but the Funeral Directors were told by the authorities they died of Covid.
    17. Fauci and Six Others at NIAID Own Patents in the Moderna Vaccine. This is a massive conflict of interest
    18. Fauci Is on the Hot Seat for Illegal Gain-Of-Function Research
    19. The virus continues to mutate making existing vaccines much less effective. All viruses throughout history have behaved this way and each successive generation is weaker than the previous. This isn't news to pharmaceutical companies who peddle their vaccines regardless.
    20. The Censorship and the complete absence of scientific debate
    21. The World’s Leading vaccinologists and doctors are sounding the alarm
    22. The jab in the arm flu & Covid vaccines cannot work because it does not induce oro-nasal induced immunity - this is basic science. The Polio vaccine is given orally and has all but wiped out that disease. That is an example of a vaccine that was created for the right reasons
    23. The executives and board members at Pfizer are on record that they have not taken their own treatment, despite all the fanfare and assurances. They are claiming that they would consider it unfair to “cut the line”. This is a preposterous excuse, and it takes an unbelievable amount of chutzpah to even say such a thing. Such a “line” is a figment of their own imagination; if they hogged a couple of injections for themselves no one would give a shit. In addition, billionaires with private jets and private islands are not known for waiting in line until hundreds of millions of peasants all over the world go first to receive anything these billionaires want for themselves
    24. The establishment media have accepted this preposterous excuse without question or concern. Moreover, they laud Pfizer’s executives for their supposed self-sacrifice in not taking their own experimental treatment until we go first. Since they consider us such fools, I do not trust them, and do not want their new treatment. They can have my place in line and I’ll go to the back of the queue - and stay there
    25. The establishment has been entirely one-sided in celebrating this treatment. The politicians and media are urging people to take it as both a moral and civic duty. The benefits of the treatment are being grossly exaggerated, the risks are being ignored, and the unknowns are being brushed aside. Because they are being deceitful and manipulative, I will not gamble my personal well-being on their integrity
    26. There is an intense propaganda campaign for people to take this treatment. Politicians and celebrities are taking selfies of themselves getting injected (perhaps in some cases pretending to get injected or it is just saline), the media is hyping this as the coolest, smartest, most happy and fun thing to do. It is the most widespread marketing campaign in history. This is not at all appropriate for any medical treatment, let alone a brand new one, and it makes me step back and pause
    27. The masses are following in tow, posting pictures of themselves getting injected with a drug, feeding the mass peer pressure to do the same. There is something very alarming and sick about this, and I want no part of it. I never took drugs just because “everyone’s doing it” and it’s cool. I’m certainly not going to start now
    28. Those who raise concerns about this medical treatment are being bullied, slandered, mocked, censored, ostracised, threatened, and fired from their jobs. This includes medical professionals who have science-based concerns about the drug and caregivers who have witnessed people under their charge suffering horrible reactions and death shortly after being injected. When the establishment is purging good people who risk everything simply to raise concerns about a new medical treatment — even if they don’t outright oppose it — I will trust these brave people over the establishment every time. I cannot think of a single similar case in history when truth and morality turned out to be on the side of the establishment
    29. This is the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race and It is purposely not being portrayed as the greatest medical experiment in the history of the human race, and the fact that it is a medical experiment at all is being severely downplayed by a largely corrupt and complicit media. And the NZ media are no better!
    30. The NZ media has access to all the same information as presented in this forum, and yet not a single question has been asked by our media that raises any of the concerns listed here. That defies all odds and leads me to conclude that either they are part of a very large conspiracy, or they are completely incompetent and stupid; and are merely left-wing activists disguised as journalists
    31. Were they up front with the masses, very few, if any, would agree to participate in such an experiment. Manipulating the masses to participate in a medical experiment under false pretences violates the foundations of medical ethics and democratic law. I will not allow unethical people who engage in such conduct to inject me with anything. (See The Nuremberg Code above)
    32. The establishment has recruited doctors, the media, and the masses via social media to harangue people who don’t want to get injected with a new drug. We are being called the worst sort of names. We are being told that we believe in crazy conspiracies, that we are against science, that we are selfish, that we are murderers, that we don’t care about the elderly, that it’s our fault that the government continues to impose draconian restrictions on the public. It’s all because we don’t want to get injected with an experimental treatment, no questions asked. They say that if we do not agree to get injected, we should be forced to stay inside our homes forever and be ostracised from public life
    33. Although many people have died shortly after getting injected – including perfectly healthy young people – we are not allowed to imply that the injection had anything to do with it. Somehow this is anti-science and will cause more people to die. I believe that denying any possible link, abusing people who speculate that there might be a link, and demonstrating not the slightest curiosity to even explore if there might be a link is what is anti-science and could very well cause more people to die. These same people believe I am obligated to get injected as well. Yeah nah! I'll take a hard pass on that one!
    34. My own local medical centre has been harassing me and my family for weeks and months about getting a vaccine, but fail to mention any alternatives such as HCQ or Ivermectin - well established and proven medications.
    35. Every person has the right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without that person's consent under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 s.10
    36. Everyone has the right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 s.11
    37. I am yet to see any good news come out of these vaccinations - so far it has all been negative, so why, on earth, would I take it?
    38. People who have recovered from Covid, as I have when I picked it up in the USA, enjoy a natural life-long immunity. The vaccines destroy this immunity.
    So effective and thorough has this propaganda campaign been, especially by the media, that extremely intelligent people I know have been completely taken in by it. They are the ones who will be the most angry when they realise the truth. I was always taught to ask questions; go by the facts and evidence you discover yourself. That is why I won't take the "vaccine", because of what I have uncovered and why I certainly don't trust politicians or the media - they truly are the enemy of the people.

    One thing is for sure - the truth will come out - is starting to come out. The day will come when these politicians won't be able to walk the streets. As George H.W Bush famously said in an interview
    If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp posts
    That quote is equally apt here in this country for all those complicit in this crime.

    If drug companies wilfully choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why would we trust any product where they have NO liability?
    VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between 14 Dec 2020 and 26 March 2021
    The propaganda, lies & misrepresentation are on such a scale that the science is not being looked at
    How do we get out of all this? See this post for the answer
    Do you have vaccine remorse? See this post for some possible methods to detoxify your body of the vaccines and other heavy metals
    Last edited by g; 25-02-22, 18:51. Reason: Additional information
    "Know thyself and thou shall know all the mysteries of the gods and of the universe"